RELASI HISTORIS ENKLAVE BAKUMPAI DI MARABAHAN, KALIMANTAN SELATAN DAN DI BUNTOK, KALIMANTAN TENGAH : KAJIAN LINGUISTIK DIAKRONIS by : Misrita Misrita

ABSTRACT : 

Abstract Historical relations between Bakumpai language in Marabahan enclave, South Kalimantan Province and in Buntok, Central Kalimantan Province is assessed quantitatively as an effort to clarify the status of the Bakumpai Marabahan enclave. The Bakumpai Marabahan enclave is hypothesized to be members of Malay language differed from the Bakumpai in Buntok that has the closeness of kinship with the Dayak language. It is done because their opinion is still confusing among linguists. The status of the enclave appears in the Wurm’s map (1983), in accordance with the opinion of anthropologists Mallinckrodt (1928) and Sellato (1980), which classifies Bakumpai Marabahan enclave as members of Malay languages. Based on the quantitative evidence, it can be found that Bakumpai Marabahan enclave and Bakumpai in Buntok is closely allied as a member of a group of the same language. The language is Bakumpai which consists of Marabahan and Buntok dialects. Thus, these results verify Hudson’s hypothesis that classified the Bakumpai language as members of the subgroup of Dayak language. Keywords: lexicostatistics, quantitative, enclave, historical relationships and diachronic analysis.

The Analysis about this abstract about :

"RELASI HISTORIS ENKLAVE BAKUMPAI DI MARABAHAN, KALIMANTAN SELATAN DAN DI BUNTOK, KALIMANTAN TENGAH : KAJIAN LINGUISTIK DIAKRONIS" by Misrita Misrita (2016) there some tense that can be analyzed in this abstract they are : 

1. Simple Past

•Abstract Historical relations between Bakumpai language in Marabahan enclave, South Kalimantan Province and in Buntok, Central Kalimantan Province is assessed quantitatively as an effort to clarify the status of the Bakumpai Marabahan enclave. The Bakumpai Marabahan enclave is hypothesized to be members of Malay language differed from the Bakumpai in Buntok that has the closeness of kinship with the Dayak language. It is done because their opinion is still confusing among linguists. The status of the enclave appears in the Wurm’s map (1983), in accordance with the opinion of anthropologists Mallinckrodt (1928) and Sellato (1980), which classifies Bakumpai Marabahan enclave as members of Malay languages. Based on the quantitative evidence, it can be found that Bakumpai Marabahan enclave and Bakumpai in Buntok is closely allied as a member of a group of the same language. The language is Bakumpai which consists of Marabahan and Buntok dialects. Thus, these results verify Hudson’s hypothesis that classified the Bakumpai language as members of the subgroup of Dayak language. Keywords: lexicostatistics, quantitative, enclave, historical relationships and diachronic analysis.

    2. Simple present 

•Abstract Historical relations between Bakumpai language in Marabahan enclave, South Kalimantan Province and in Buntok, Central Kalimantan Province is assessed quantitatively as an effort to clarify the status of the Bakumpai Marabahan enclave. The Bakumpai Marabahan enclave is hypothesized to be members of Malay language differed from the Bakumpai in Buntok that has the closeness of kinship with the Dayak language. It is done because their opinion is still confusing among linguists. The status of the enclave appears in the Wurm’s map (1983), in accordance with the opinion of anthropologists Mallinckrodt (1928) and Sellato (1980), which classifies Bakumpai Marabahan enclave as members of Malay languages. Based on the quantitative evidence, it can be found that Bakumpai Marabahan enclave and Bakumpai in Buntok is closely allied as a member of a group of the same language. The language is Bakumpai which consists of Marabahan and Buntok dialects. Thus, these results verify Hudson’s hypothesis that classified the Bakumpai language as members of the subgroup of Dayak language. Keywords: lexicostatistics, quantitative, enclave, historical relationships and diachronic analysis.

The Analysis of Tenses :


1. Historical relations (S) between Bakumpai language in Marabahan enclave, South Kalimantan Province and in Buntok, Central Kalimantan Province is assessed (Verb2) quantitatively as an effort to clarify the status of the Bakumpai Marabahan enclave. ➨ Simple Past Tense

2. The Bakumpai Marabahan (S) enclave is hypothesized (Verb2) to be members of Malay language differed from the Bakumpai in Buntok that has the closeness of kinship with the Dayak language. ➨ Simple Past Tense


3. It is done because their opinion (S) is (To be) still confusing (Present Participle+ing) among linguists. ➨ Present Continous Tense

4. The status of the enclave (S) appears (Verb1+s/es) in the Wurm’s map (1983), in accordance with the opinion of anthropologists Mallinckrodt (1928) and Sellato (1980), which classifies (Verb1+s/es) Bakumpai Marabahan enclave as members of Malay languages. ➨ Simple Present Tense, Positive Sentence, Singular Subject


5. Based (Verb2) on the quantitative evidence (S), it can be found that Bakumpai Marabahan enclave and Bakumpai in Buntok (S) is closely allied(Verb2) as a member of a group of the same language. ➨ Simple Past Tense


6. The language is Bakumpai which consists (Verb1+s/es) of Marabahan and Buntok (S) dialects. ➨ Simple Present Tense, Singular Subject

7. Thus, these results (S) verify Hudson’s hypothesis that classified (Verb2)the Bakumpai language as members of the subgroup of Dayak language.➨ Simple Past Tense

Reference(s) :
Misrita.2016.”RELASI HISTORIS ENKLAVE BAKUMPAI DI MARABAHAN, KALIMANTAN SELATAN DAN DI BUNTOK, KALIMANTAN TENGAH : KAJIAN LINGUISTIK DIAKRONIS”.Yogyakarta : Universitas Gadjah Mada

Name : Edophalar Jhosua T.

Nim : CCA 118 062

English B Class